Throsby, D. Investment in urban heritage conservation in developing countries: Concepts, methods and data. City Cult. Soc. 7(2), 81–86. (2016).
Google Scholar
Havinga, L., Colenbrander, B. & Schellen, H. Heritage significance and the identification of attributes to preserve in a sustainable refurbishment. J. Cult. Herit. 43, 282–293. (2020).
Google Scholar
Ocón, D. Balancing sustainable development and cultural heritage preservation: Luxury burial legacies in Singapore. J. Cult. Heritage Manag. Sustain. Develop. 13(1), 87–107. (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhou, W., Song, S. & Feng, K. The sustainability cycle of historic houses and cultural memory: Controversy between historic preservation and heritage conservation. Front. Arch. Res. 11(6), 1030–1046. (2022).
Google Scholar
Zal, M. H., Lasboyee, R. & Ismail, A. The traditional urban areas and its role in the development of cultural heritage tourism (Case Study: The historical areas of Sari). Urban Manag. 17(53), 7–26 (2019).
Dalmat, R. R. et al. Walkability measures to predict the likelihood of walking in a place: A classification and regression tree analysis. Health Place 72, 102700. (2021).
Google Scholar
Rafiemanzelat, R., Emadi, M. I. & Kamali, A. J. City sustainability: The influence of walkability on built environments. Transp. Res. Procedia 24, 97–104. (2017).
Google Scholar
Yu, P. et al. Embedding of spatial equity in a rapidly urbanizing area: Walkability and air pollution exposure. Cities 131, 103942. (2022).
Google Scholar
Poklewski-Koziełł, D., Dudzic-Gyurkovich, K. & Marmolejo Duarte, C. Investigating urban form and walkability measures in the new developments. The case study of Garnizon in Gdansk. Land Use Policy. 125, 106471. (2023).
Google Scholar
Bartzokas Tsiompras, A. & Photis, Y. N. What matters when it comes to “Walk and the city”? Defining a weighted GIS-based walkability index. Transp. Res. Procedia 24, 523–530. (2017).
Google Scholar
Shafabakhsh, G., Hadjihoseinlou, M. & Taghizadeh, S. A. Selecting the appropriate public transportation system to access the Sari International Airport by fuzzy decision making. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 6, 277–285. (2014).
Google Scholar
Kun, Y., Abe, H., Otsuka, N., Yasufuku, K. & Takahashi, A. A comprehensive evaluation of walkability in historical cities: The case of Xi’an and Kyoto. Sustainability. (2023).
Google Scholar
Zainol, R. et al. Pedestrianization and walkability in a fast developing UNESCO World Heritage City. Open House Int. (2016).
Google Scholar
Jiménez Martín, D., Ramírez Saiz, A. & Ajuriaguerra Escudero, M. A. Urban accessibility in world heritage cities. Accessibility considerations in pedestrian routes in historic city centres. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. (2022).
Google Scholar
Gargiulo, C. & Sgambati, S. Active mobility in historical centres: Towards an accessible and competitive city. Transp. Res. Procedia 60, 552–559. (2022).
Google Scholar
Hend, H. Y. Livable City: An approach to pedestrianization through tactical urbanism. Alexandria Eng. J. (2019).
Google Scholar
Hassanshahi, G., Soltani, A., Roosta, M. & Askari, S. Walking as soft mobility: A multi-criteria GIS-based approach for prioritizing tourist routes. Front. Archit. Res. 12(6), 1080–1096. (2023).
Google Scholar
Pooley, C. G., Emanuel, M., Männistö-Funk, T. & Norton, P. Introduction: Historical perspectives on pedestrians and the city. Urban Hist. (2021).
Google Scholar
Mendzina, E., & Vugule, K. (2020). Importance and planning of pedestrian streets in urban environment. Sci. J. Latvia Univ. Life Sci. Technol. Landsc. Architecture Art. 16(16), 80. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2020.16.08
Henderson, J. Making cities more walkable for tourists: A view from Singapore’s streets. Int. J. Tourism Cities 4(3), 285–297. (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Azzali, S., Janssen, P., & Stouffs, R. (2018). Design for walkable neighbourhoods in Singapore using Form-based Codes. In Proceedings of the IFoU 2018: Reframing Urban Resilience Implementation: Aligning Sustainability and Resilience (pp. 1–14). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/IFOU2018-05934
Ashraf, M. T., Dey, K. & Pyrialakou, D. Investigation of pedestrian and bicyclist safety in public transportation systems. J. Transp. Health 27, 101529. (2022).
Google Scholar
Rahul, T. M. & Verma, A. Sustainability analysis of pedestrian and cycling infrastructure—A case study for Bangalore. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 6(4), 483–493. (2018).
Google Scholar
Soliz, A. & Pérez-López, R. “Footbridges”: Pedestrian infrastructure or urban barrier?. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 55, 101161. (2022).
Google Scholar
Jabbari, M. et al. The Pedestrian Network Concept: A systematic literature review. J. Urban Mobility 3, 100051. (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, X. et al. Connectivity analysis in pedestrian networks: A case study in Wuhan, China. Appl. Geogr. 151, 102843. (2023).
Google Scholar
Yuan, K., Abe, H., Otsuka, N., Yasufuku, K. & Takahashi, A. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Walkability in Historical Cities: The Case of Xi’an and Kyoto. Sustainability 15(6), 5525. (2023).
Google Scholar
Mansourihanis, O., Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J., Yousefian, S. & Zaroujtaghi, A. A computational geospatial approach to assessing land-use compatibility in urban planning. Land 12, 2083. (2023).
Google Scholar
Schröder, M. & Cabral, P. Eco-friendly 3D-routing: A GIS based 3D-Routing-Model to estimate and reduce CO2-emissions of distribution transports. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 73, 40–55. (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, W., Cheng, X. & Dai, M. Strategies for sustainable urban development and morphological optimization of street canyons: Measurement and simulation of PM25 at different points and heights. Sustain. Cities Society. 87, 104191. (2022).
Google Scholar
Guzman, L. A., Arellana, J. & Castro, W. F. Desirable streets for pedestrians: Using a street-level index to assess walkability. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 111, 103462. (2022).
Google Scholar
Bornioli, A., Parkhurst, G. & Morgan, P. L. Affective experiences of built environments and the promotion of urban walking. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Practice 123, 200–215. (2019).
Google Scholar
Dean, J. et al. Thinking relationally about built environments and walkability: A study of adult walking behavior in Waterloo, Ontario. Health Place 64, 102352. (2020).
Google Scholar
Hassan, D. K. & Elkhateeb, A. Walking experience: Exploring the trilateral interrelation of walkability, temporal perception, and urban ambiance. Front. Architect. Res. 10(3), 516–539. (2021).
Google Scholar
Gao, W. et al. Assessment of sidewalk walkability: Integrating objective and subjective measures of identical context-based sidewalk features. Sustain. Cities Society 87, 104142. (2022).
Google Scholar
Fonseca, F., Fernandes, E. & Ramos, R. Walkable cities: Using the smart pedestrian net method for evaluating a pedestrian network in Guimarães, Portugal. Sustainability 14(16), 10306. (2022).
Google Scholar
Wei, W. et al. Environment-deterministic pedestrian behavior? New insights from surveillance video evidence. Cities 125, 103638. (2022).
Google Scholar
Zolfani, S. H., Sedaghat, M., Maknoon, R. & Zavadskas, E. K. Sustainable tourism: A comprehensive literature review on frameworks and applications. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1), 1–30. (2015).
Google Scholar
Silverman, B. G., Hanrahan, N., Huang, L., Rabinowitz, E. F., Lim, S. Artificial intelligence and human behavior modeling and simulation for mental health conditions. in (D. D. Luxton, Ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Behavioral and Mental Health Care, 163–183. (Academic Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420248-1.00007-6
Meir, A., Tapiro, H. & Oron-Gilad, T. Towards safer, more walkable urban environments for child-pedestrians—Application of the theory of Planned behavior. Safety Sci. 164, 106148. (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q. et al. Brain activation of the PFC during dual-task walking in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies. Front. Neurosci. 17, 1111274. (2023).
Google Scholar
Fancello, G., Congiu, T. & Tsoukiàs, A. Mapping walkability: A subjective value theory approach. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 72, 100923. (2020).
Google Scholar
Seles, E. & Afacan, Y. Exploring the relationship between health and walkability. Open House Int. 44(1), 44–52. (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, J., Liu, L. & Pei, M. Analysis of older people’s walking behavioral intention with the extended theory of planned behavior. J. Transp. Health 26, 101462. (2022).
Google Scholar
Rahman, M. & Sciara, G. Travel attitudes, the built environment and travel behavior relationships: Causal insights from social psychology theories. Transp. Policy 123, 44–54. (2022).
Google Scholar
Shang, C., Moss, A. C. & Chen, A. The expectancy-value theory: A meta-analysis of its application in physical education. J. Sport Health Sci. 12(1), 52–64. (2023).
Google Scholar
Scott, N. & Cooper, C. Innovation for sustainable urban tourism: Some thoughts on best practice. Revista de Administração Pública. (2010).
Google Scholar
Priatmoko, S., Kabil, M., Vasa, L., Pallás, E. I. & Dávid, L. D. Reviving an unpopular tourism destination through the placemaking approach: Case study of Ngawen Temple, Indonesia. Sustainability 13, 6704. (2021).
Google Scholar
Grube, N. Seeking pathways for sustainable urban tourism: A critical deconstruction of Berlin’s approach for city-compatible tourism. Eur. Plan. Stud. 31(8), 1673–1692. (2023).
Google Scholar
De Vos, J., Lättman, K., van der Vlugt, A.-L., Welsch, J. & Otsuka, N. Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: A literature review, conceptual model and research agenda. Transp. Rev. 43(2), 303–324. (2023).
Google Scholar
Gorrini, A. & Bertini, V. Walkability assessment and tourism cities: The case of Venice. Int. J. Tourism Cities 4(3), 355–368. (2018).
Google Scholar
Dragović, D. et al. A literature review of parameter-based models for walkability evaluation. Appl. Sci. 13(7), 4408. (2023).
Google Scholar
Liang, Y., D’Uva, D., Scandiffio, A. & Rolando, A. The more walkable, the more livable? Can urban attractiveness improve urban vitality?. Transp. Res. Procedia 60, 322–329. (2022).
Google Scholar
Manzolli, J. A., Oliveira, A. & Castro Neto, M. Evaluating walkability through a multi-criteria decision analysis approach: A Lisbon Case Study. Sustainability 13(3), 1450. (2021).
Google Scholar
Basu, N., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., King, M., Kamruzzaman, M. & Haque, M. M. The influence of the built environment on pedestrians’ perceptions of attractiveness, safety and security. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 87, 203–218. (2022).
Google Scholar
Hall, C. M. & Ram, Y. Walk score® and its potential contribution to the study of active transport and walkability: A critical and systematic review. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 61(Part B), 310–324. (2018).
Google Scholar
AlKheder, S. et al. Walkability, risk perception and safety assessment among urban college pedestrians in Kuwait. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 86, 10–32. (2022).
Google Scholar
Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., Aghaabbasi, M., Cools, M. & Shah, M. Z. Exploring effective micro-level items for evaluating inclusive walking facilities on urban streets (applied in Johor Bahru, Malaysia). Sustain. Cities Society 49, 101563. (2019).
Google Scholar
Sugiyama, T., Carver, A., Koohsari, M. J. & Veitch, J. Advantages of public green spaces in enhancing population health. Landsc. Urban Planning 178, 12–17. (2018).
Google Scholar
Naya, R. B. et al. Quality of public space and sustainable development goals: Analysis of nine urban projects in Spanish cities. Front. Architectural Res. 12(3), 477–495 (2023).
Google Scholar
Moayedi, F., Zakaria, R., Bigah, Y., Mustafar, M., Che Puan, O., & Zin, I. S., Klufallah, M. M. A. (2013). Conceptualising the indicators of walkability for sustainable transportation. Jurnal Teknologi. 65, 3. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2151
Mulyadi, A. M., Sihombing, A. V. R., Hendrawan, H., Vitriana, A. & Nugroho, A. Walkability and importance assessment of pedestrian facilities in the central business district of the capital city of Indonesia. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 16, 100695. (2022).
Google Scholar
Labdaoui, K., Mazouz, S., Moeinaddini, M., Cools, M. & Teller, J. The Street Walkability and Thermal Comfort Index (SWTCI): A new assessment tool combining street design measurements and thermal comfort. Sci. Total Environ. 795, 148663. (2021).
Google Scholar
Raja Ariffin, R., Raja Noriza, N., Abd Rahman, N. & Zahari, R. Systematic literature review of walkability and the built environment. J. Policy Governance. (2021).
Google Scholar
Zuniga-Teran, A. A. et al. Exploring the influence of neighborhood walkability on the frequency of use of greenspace. Landsc. Urban Planning 190, 103609. (2019).
Google Scholar
Lyons, G. Walking as a service–Does it have legs?. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Practice 137, 271–284 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ujang, N., Moulay, A., Ahmad, N., Maulan, S. & Bakar, N. A. A. Interrelation between legibility attributes and park utilization as determinants for responsive neighborhood parks. Archnet-IJAR Int. J. Architectural Res. 12(2), 40 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tian, L., Liang, Y. & Zhang, B. Measuring residential and industrial land use mix in the peri-urban areas of China. Land Use Policy 69, 427–438. (2017).
Google Scholar
Nabil, N. A. & Abd Eldayem, G. E. Influence of mixed land-use on realizing social capital. HBRC J. 11(2), 285–298 (2015).
Google Scholar
Taylor, L. & Hochuli, D. F. Defining greenspace: Multiple uses across multiple disciplines. Landsc. Urban Planning 158, 25–38. (2017).
Google Scholar
Halecki, W., Stachura, T., Fudała, W., Stec, A. & Kuboń, S. Assessment and planning of green spaces in urban parks: A review. Sustain. Cities Society 88, 104280. (2023).
Google Scholar
Kolimenakis, A. et al. The socioeconomic welfare of urban green areas and parks: A literature review of available evidence. Sustainability 13(14), 7863. (2021).
Google Scholar
Braubach, M. et al. Effects of urban green space on environmental health, equity, and resilience. In Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas (eds Kabisch, N. et al.) 157–174 (Springer, 2017).
Pappalardo, G. & Gabrielli, L. Quantifying store accessibility by using street centrality and topography indicators: An exploratory analysis. Appl. Geogr. 134, 102541. (2022).
Google Scholar
Dornoff, R. J. & Tankersley, M. The effect of retail density and need for affiliation on shopping pleasure. J. Business Res. 64(2), 132–139. (2011).
Google Scholar
Hadavi, M. & Pasdarshahri, H. Investigating effects of urban configuration and density on urban climate and building systems energy consumption. J. Building Eng. 44, 102710. (2021).
Google Scholar
Allahdadi, M. (2017). Effectiveness of urban furniture designing to enhance social interactions. In International Conference on Contemporary Iran on Civil Engineering Architecture and Urban Development (pp. 213–218). Tehran, Iran.
Corazza, M. V., Di Mascio, P. & Moretti, L. Managing sidewalk pavement maintenance: A case study to increase pedestrian safety. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 3(3), 203–214. (2016).
Google Scholar
Rhoads, D., Solé-Ribalta, A. & Borge-Holthoefer, J. The inclusive 15-minute city: Walkability analysis with sidewalk networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 100, 101936. (2023).
Google Scholar
Deng, H., Tian, M., Ou, Z. & Deng, Y. A semantic framework for on-site evacuation routing based on awareness of obstacle accessibility. Autom. Constr. 136, 104154. (2022).
Google Scholar
Jehle, U., Coetzee, C., Büttner, B., Pajares, E. & Wulfhorst, G. Connecting people and places: Analysis of perceived pedestrian accessibility to railway stations by Bavarian case studies. J. Urban Mobility 2, 100025. (2022).
Google Scholar
Barter, P. A. Singapore. In Parking (eds Pojani, D. et al.) 179–206 (Elsevier, 2020).
Google Scholar
Knapskog, M., Hagen, O. H., Tennøy, A. & Rynning, M. K. Exploring ways of measuring walkability. Transp. Res. Procedia 41, 264–282. (2019).
Google Scholar
Tahmasbi, B. & Haghshenas, H. Public transport accessibility measure based on weighted door-to-door travel time. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 76, 163–177. (2019).
Google Scholar
Kent, J. Transport, access, and health. In Urban Form and Accessibility (eds Mulley, C. & Nelson, J. D.) 207–222 (Elsevier, 2021).
Google Scholar
Lucchesi, S. T., Larranaga, A. M., Ochoa, J. A. A., Samios, A. A. B. & Cybis, H. B. B. The role of security and walkability in subjective well-being: A multigroup analysis among different age cohorts. Res. Transp. Business Manag. 40, 100559. (2021).
Google Scholar
Gillath, O., Karantzas, G. C. & Fraley, R. C. What is the attachment behavioral system? And, how is it linked to other behavioral systems? In Adult Attachment (eds Gillath, O. et al.) 169–192 (Academic Press, 2016).
Google Scholar
Peña-García, A. & Hurtado, M. C. Impact of public lighting on pedestrians’ perception of safety and well-being. Safety Sci. 78, 142–148. (2015).
Google Scholar
Haans, A. & de Kort, Y. A. W. Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: Two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, prospect, concealment, and escape. J. Environ. Psychol. 32(4), 342–352. (2012).
Google Scholar
Torres, C. et al. Evaluation of pedestrian behavior on mid-block crosswalks: A case study in Fortaleza—Brazil. Front. Sustain. Cities. (2020) (ISSN: 2624-9634).
Google Scholar
Kostanjsek, J., & Lipar, P. (2007). Pedestrian crossings priority for pedestrian safety [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the 3rd Urban Street Symposium. Seattle.
Luo, L., Luo, Y., Feng, Y., Li, T. & Fu, Z. Experimental investigation on pedestrian–bicycle mixed merging flow in T-junction. Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl. 600, 127492. (2022).
Google Scholar
Singh, M., Zhang, Y., Cheng, W., Li, Y. & Clay, E. Effect of transit-oriented design on pedestrian and cyclist safety using bivariate spatial models. J. Safety Res. 83, 152–162. (2022).
Google Scholar
Tang, L. et al. Pedestrian crossing design and analysis for symmetric intersections: Efficiency and safety. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Practice 142, 187–206. (2020).
Google Scholar
Nasrollahi, N., Ghosouri, A., Khodakarami, J. & Taleghani, M. Heat-mitigation strategies to improve pedestrian thermal comfort in urban environments: A review. Sustainability 12(23), 10000. (2020).
Google Scholar
National Association of City Transportation Officials. (2013). Urban Street Design Guide. Island Press. Retrieved May 11, 2023, from https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/.
Harrou, F., Zeroual, A., Hittawe, M. M., & Sun, Y. (Eds.). (2022). Traffic congestion detection: Data-based techniques. In Road Traffic Modeling and Management (pp. 141–195). Elsevier. ISBN 9780128234327. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823432-7.00010-0.
Carlson, H. et al. Sustained effects of pleasant and unpleasant smells on resting state brain activity. Cortex 132, 386–403. (2020).
Google Scholar
Kashef, M. The building blocks of walkability: Pedestrian activity in Abu Dhabi city center. Front. Architect. Res. 11(2), 203–223. (2022).
Google Scholar
Pafka, E. & Dovey, K. Permeability and interface catchment: Measuring and mapping walkable access. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 10(2), 150–162. (2017).
Google Scholar
Miranda, A. S., Fan, Z., Duarte, F. & Ratti, C. Desirable streets: Using deviations in pedestrian trajectories to measure the value of the built environment. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 86, 101563. (2021).
Google Scholar
Sevtsuk, A., Basu, R., Li, X. & Kalvo, R. A big data approach to understanding pedestrian route choice preferences: Evidence from San Francisco. Travel Behav. Society 25, 41–51. (2021).
Google Scholar
Alaei, L. & Mirriahi, S. Designing the Hall in the City of Sari with an emphasis on the improvement and identity of architecture of Mazandaran, Taberestan. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36(3), 3889–3901 (2015).
Sadat, M. & Imani Khoshkhoo, M. H. Presenting a model for development of religious tourism in Mazandaran Province (Case study: Sari city). Int. J. Tourism Culture Spirituality. 5(2), 89–102 (2022).
D’Orso, G. & Migliore, M. A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments. J. Transp. Geogr. 82, 102555. (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Sun, G. & Webster, C. Walkability scoring: Why and how does a three-dimensional pedestrian network matter?. Environ. Plan. B Urban Analyt. City Sci. 48(8), 2418–2435. (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H. & Zhang, Y. Pedestrian network analysis using a network consisting of formal pedestrian facilities: Sidewalks and crosswalks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673(7), 294–307. (2019).
Google Scholar
Bolten, N. & Caspi, A. Towards routine, city-scale accessibility metrics: Graph theoretic interpretations of pedestrian access using personalized pedestrian network analysis. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0248399. (2021).
Google Scholar
Jabbari, M., Fonseca, F. & Ramos, R. Accessibility and connectivity criteria for assessing walkability: An application in Qazvin, Iran. Sustainability 13(7), 3648. (2021).
Google Scholar
Dehghani, A. & Soltani, A. Site selection of car parking with the GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 23(02), 715–740. (2024).
Google Scholar
Soltani, A., Balaghi, R., Rezaei, M. & Riyabi, M. A. Spatial analysis and urban land use planning with emphasis on hospital site selection, case study: Isfahan city. Bull. Geogr. Socio-Econ. Ser. 5(43), 71–89. (2019).
Google Scholar
Soltani, A. & Marandi, E. Z. Hospital site selection using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria decision making process. J. Urban Environ. Eng. 5(1), 32–43. (2011).
Google Scholar
Frank, L. D., Appleyard, B. S., Ulmer, J. M., Chapman, J. E. & Fox, E. H. Comparing walkability methods: Creation of street smart walk score and efficacy of a code-based 3D walkability index. J. Transp. Health 21, 101005. (2021).
Google Scholar
Annunziata, A., Garau, C. (2020). A literature review on walkability and its theoretical framework. in Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2020 (pp. 412–425). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_32.
Sluser, B., Plavan, O., & Teodosiu, C. (2022). Environmental impact and risk assessment. in (C. Teodosiu, S. Fiore, & A. Hospido, Eds.), Assessing Progress Towards Sustainability, 189–217. (Elsevier, ISBN 9780323858519). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85851-9.00004-3.
Mishra, A. K., Deep, S. & Choudhary, A. Identification of suitable sites for organic farming using AHP & GIS. Egypt. J. Remote Sensing Space Sci. 18(2), 181–193. (2015).
Google Scholar
Parry, J. A., Ganaie, S. A. & Bhat, M. S. GIS based land suitability analysis using AHP model for urban services planning in Srinagar and Jammu urban centers of J&K, India. J. Urban Manag. 7(2), 46–56. (2018).
Google Scholar
Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Multi-attribute decision making in urban studies. in (N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes, Eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 10157–10160. Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04437-5.
Sutadian, A. D., Muttil, N., Yilmaz, A. G. & Perera, B. J. C. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to identify parameter weights for developing a water quality index. Ecol. Indicators 75, 220–233. (2017).
Google Scholar
Ding, D., Wu, J., Zhu, S., Mu, Y. & Li, Y. Research on AHP-based fuzzy evaluation of urban green building planning. Environ. Challenges 5, 100305. (2021).
Google Scholar
Chan, E. T. H., Schwanen, T. & Banister, D. Towards a multiple-scenario approach for walkability assessment: An empirical application in Shenzhen, China. Sustain. Cities Society 71, 102949. (2021).
Google Scholar
Taleai, M. & Taheri Amiri, E. Spatial multi-criteria and multi-scale evaluation of walkability potential at street segment level: A case study of Tehran. Sustain. Cities Society 31, 37–50. (2017).
Google Scholar
Caselli, B., Rossetti, S., Ignaccolo, M., Zazzi, M., Torrisi, V. (2021). Towards the definition of a comprehensive walkability index for historical centres. in Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2021 (pp. 472–488). Springer.
link